nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:01:24 -0700

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM Job Snijders <job () instituut net> wrote:

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
A similar take, is that big eyeballs (tmobile, comcast, sprint, att,
verizon
wireless) and big content (goog, fb, akamai, netflix) are ipv6.  Whats
left
on ipv4 is the long tail of people asking for help on how to buy a /24

Joking aside, I suspect that what's left is on the long tail is
actually long haul traffic. I'm not aware of any transit provider
reporting anything close to the numbers that the CDNs observe in terms
of IPv4 / IPv6 percentage split.

I posit that the more miles a packet has to travel, the more likely it
is to be an IPv4 packet.


Related. The more miles the traffic travels the more likely it is the long
tail ipv4 15% of internet that is not the wales : google, fb, netflix,
apple, akamai ... and i will even throw in cloudflare.

I hear transit is dead

https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/




Kind regards,

Job



Current thread: