nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:01:24 -0700
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM Job Snijders <job () instituut net> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:A similar take, is that big eyeballs (tmobile, comcast, sprint, att,verizonwireless) and big content (goog, fb, akamai, netflix) are ipv6. Whatslefton ipv4 is the long tail of people asking for help on how to buy a /24Joking aside, I suspect that what's left is on the long tail is actually long haul traffic. I'm not aware of any transit provider reporting anything close to the numbers that the CDNs observe in terms of IPv4 / IPv6 percentage split. I posit that the more miles a packet has to travel, the more likely it is to be an IPv4 packet.
Related. The more miles the traffic travels the more likely it is the long tail ipv4 15% of internet that is not the wales : google, fb, netflix, apple, akamai ... and i will even throw in cloudflare. I hear transit is dead https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/
Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Scott Weeks (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Matt Harris (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Job Snijders (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Rubens Kuhl (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Ca By (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Job Snijders (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Ca By (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Job Snijders (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jared Mauch (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Seth Mattinen (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jeremy Austin (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jared Mauch (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mike Hammett (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Job Snijders (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Matt Harris (Jun 11)