nanog mailing list archives

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?


From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 23:36:45 +0200

One more open source option:

https://www.gestioip.net/


Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> en nombre de Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Fecha: domingo, 10 de junio de 2018, 23:01
Para: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
CC: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Asunto: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?

    Hey Mike,
    
    On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com> wrote:
    > Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated..
    
    This is always a good thing to review every 2-3 years or so.
    
    My current favorites in the open source world are:
    
    Netbox - https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox
    NIPAP - http://spritelink.github.io/NIPAP/
    ed - http://man.openbsd.org/ed ;-)
    
    Give a few of the IPAMs out there a chance and just see which one
    suits your operational procedures best! (Though, using a spreadsheet
    file on a shared network drive is still not recommended.)
    
    Kind regards,
    
    Job
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
inform about this communication and delete it.




Current thread: