nanog mailing list archives
Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 14:50:05 -0700
On Jul 31, 2018, at 2:28 PM, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote: Its tough to prove a negative. I'm extremely confident the answer is yes, public internet multicast is not viable.
From a technical perspective, yeah, that’s right, but as you say, tough to prove a negative. If you want to give them a “why” it doesn’t work, Zhi-Li Zhang and I wrote that up fifteen years ago, when it became evident that it wasn’t going to happen. https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/multicast-billing/multicast-billing-v10.pdf -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Sean Donelan (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet William Herrin (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Sean Donelan (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Job Snijders (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Bill Woodcock (Jul 31)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Bill Woodcock (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet John Kristoff (Jul 31)