nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proving Gig Speed
From: Daniel Ankers <md1clv () md1clv com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 16:46:10 +0100
On 17 July 2018 at 15:41, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
10G to the home will be pointless as more and more people move away from Ethernet to WiFi where the noise floor for most installs prevents anyone from reaching 802.11n speeds, much less whatever alphabet soup comes later.
That's unless 802.11ad/.11ay gain in popularity. 60GHz offers lots of bandwidth and isn't particularly good at getting through brick walls, which might offer some relief to the noise floor problem. Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Proving Gig Speed, (continued)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Keith Stokes (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed joel jaeggli (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 19)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Keith Stokes (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed bzs (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed valdis . kletnieks (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Daniel Ankers (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- RE: Proving Gig Speed Keith Medcalf (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Seth Mattinen (Jul 18)