nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proving Gig Speed
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:06:27 +0200
On 16/Jul/18 23:19, Michael Thomas wrote:
As we get more and more stuff on our home networks, the probability for crappy software, infected devices, piggy updates, etc multiplies. I'm sure this isn't news to $CORPRO network managers, but at home we quite literally have nothing to help us figure out and remedy these kinds of problems. Or if it turns out to *not* be our problem, that we have some reassurance when we decide to call the support desk and be put through IVR maze hell only to find out it was a local problem after all.
Well, at least you had the foresight not to "speed test" your way you into keeping your popcorn fresh :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Proving Gig Speed, (continued)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed valdis . kletnieks (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Simon Leinen (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Ben Cannon (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Michael Thomas (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Saku Ytti (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed James Bensley (Jul 17)
- Carriage Burst Speeds [was Re: Proving Gig Speed] Reuben Farrelly via NANOG (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed James Bensley (Jul 17)