nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proving Gig Speed
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:51:40 +0200
On 16/Jul/18 20:08, Jared Mauch wrote:
This means a 920Mb/s link may actually be 100% once you add back in ethernet framing. Remind folks that they are seeing the TCP/UDP throughput and there is ethernet + IP headers involved.
But you sold me 1Gbps. Stop stiffing me my 80Mbps :-)... Mark.
Current thread:
- Proving Gig Speed Chris Gross (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Dan White (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Jared Mauch (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Matt Hoppes (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Matt Hoppes (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Jared Mauch (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Dan White (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 22)