nanog mailing list archives
Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
From: Scott Fisher <sfisher () cymru com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:17:19 -0400
Youssef & all, My team will investigate this and get back to the list on what we are going to do. Thanks, Scott Fisher Systems Engineer Team Cymru On 6/28/18 3:11 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
Hello Job, Thank you for this feedback. I guess that NTT adopting this as a best practice will ring some bells around. Do you know if Team Cymru has updated their filters accordingly ? Best regards.Le 28 juin 2018 à 20:58, Job Snijders <job () ntt net> a écrit : Dear alll, Thank you all for your input. Just a heads-up - we deployed a few days ago. NTT / AS 2914 now considers “2002::/16 le 128” and “192.88.99.0/24 le 32” to be bogon prefixes, and no longer accepts announcements for these destinations from any EBGP neighbor. Kind regards, Job
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Scott Fisher (Jul 06)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Jul 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Gary McArtor (Jul 06)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG) (Jul 09)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG) (Jul 09)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? LHC (Jul 09)
- Re: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters? Fabien VINCENT (NaNOG) (Jul 09)