nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:53:18 -0600 (CST)
Knowing the relationship between my provider and whomever they are learning the route from is handy. It allows me to do things such as filter on those communities for passing prefixes down into less capable hardware. I may elect to pass customer or customer and peering routes from a given provider down into routers throughout my network with limited FIB capability. They can decide which way to send traffic that should be immediately apparent where the best path is, while leaving the provider edge routers to decide for prefixes beyond that. Say a CCR or a switch with some layer 3 capabilities. Then obviously things like blackhole and (local_pref, prepend, no export, etc. per AS). The above I'd say is rather important. The next step would be location-aware stuff in the presentation that would be nice to have. If your provider is having an issue with an upstream or peer in a given city\region, being able to avoid that would be nice. Of course that assumes you figure out their problem and the work-around before they're able to fix it themselves. Well, assuming it's a short-term issue, anyway. If it's a constant issue, your provider isn't likely to fix it faster than you because they're not fixing it at all. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Breeden" <James () arenalgroup co> To: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 1:17:45 PM Subject: Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet I've seen the onestep list but the presentation is helpful. I guess my question was moreso to the people side of communities vs the technicalities of communities - what ones do people find themselves using most often and what do they wish was available from providers that really isn't otherwise out there? James W. Breeden Managing Partner [logo_transparent_background] Arenal Group: Arenal Consulting Group | Acilis Telecom | Pines Media PO Box 1063 | Smithville, TX 78957 Email: james () arenalgroup co<mailto:james () arenalgroup co> | office 512.360.0000 | cell 512.304.0745 | www.arenalgroup.co<http://www.arenalgroup.co/> ________________________________ From: christopher.morrow () gmail com <christopher.morrow () gmail com> on behalf of Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 1:07:29 PM To: Mike Hammett Cc: James Breeden; NANOG list Subject: Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net<mailto:nanog () ics-il net>> wrote: These? :-) https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog40/presentations/BGPcommunities.pdf you could also probably get some good examples cribbed from the collection: https://onestep.net/communities/
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet, (continued)
- Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet Dan White (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet Bryan Holloway (Jan 23)
- IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Alain Hebert (Jan 24)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Nick Hilliard (Jan 24)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Job Snijders (Jan 24)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Job Snijders (Jan 27)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Baldur Norddahl (Jan 27)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Job Snijders (Jan 27)
- Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: BGP Community Support WAS: Re: Cogent vs. HE ;-) WAS: Anyone using Cogent Ethernet Mike Hammett (Jan 23)