nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stupid Question maybe?
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:54:34 +0000
I am wondering how a netmask could be not contiguous when the network portion of the address must be contiguous. I suppose a bit mask could certainly be anything you want but a netmask specifically identifies the network portion of an address. Steve
I seem to remember that before the advent of VLSM and CIDR there was no requirement for the 1 bits in the netmask to be contiguous with no intervening 0 bits and there was always someone who tested it out on a production network just to prove a point (usually only once)
Current thread:
- RE: Stupid Question maybe?, (continued)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? David Edelman (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 18)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? Philip Loenneker (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Saku Ytti (Dec 18)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Christian Meutes (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? Naslund, Steve (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 19)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? Naslund, Steve (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Adam Atkinson (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Smoot Carl-Mitchell (Dec 20)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? valdis . kletnieks (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Thomas Bellman (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? William Herrin (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Thomas Bellman (Dec 19)
- Re: Stupid Question maybe? Owen DeLong (Dec 19)
- RE: Stupid Question maybe? David Edelman (Dec 19)