nanog mailing list archives
RE: Extending network over a dry pair
From: Chris Kimball <CKimball () misalliance com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:19:10 +0000
HA! But the question is; does it pass? ^^^ and that was my official 'first post' beware my linked in requests now😊 -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Phillip Carroll Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:53 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Extending network over a dry pair Whenever I have a dry pair I use fluke lube. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Blake Hudson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:40 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Extending network over a dry pair Nick Bogle wrote on 12/12/2018 3:25 PM:
A quick question for you guys; If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't cutting it anymore. Unfortunately it's a research site on a federally protected wildlife preserve so we can't run any new infrastructure (fiber etc) and it isn't in a geographical place where point to point wireless is practical. We were thinking there is some sort of network extender that uses some form of DSL for higher bandwidth capacity. Any suggestions?
Blackbox makes a variety of different types of " network extenders" (aka bridges) - https://www.blackbox.com/en-us/products/black-box-brand-products/networking/extenders As others have said, 6 miles might limit your bandwidth capacity. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential, and the message is for the use of intended recipients only. If you are not the intended recipient, do not disseminate, copy, or disclose this communication or its contents. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify me by replying to the email or call MIS Alliance at 617-500-1700 and permanently delete this communication.
Current thread:
- Extending network over a dry pair Nick Bogle (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Marshall, Quincy (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jeremy Austin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Ray Van Dolson (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Josh Luthman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Mel Beckman (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Blake Hudson (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Chris Kimball (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 12)
- RE: Extending network over a dry pair Phillip Carroll (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Alfie Pates (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Baldur Norddahl (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Jameson, Daniel (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Shawn L via NANOG (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Andrew Latham (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair William Herrin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair William Herrin (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Dan Hollis (Dec 12)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Mike Hammett (Dec 13)
- Re: Extending network over a dry pair Tim Pozar (Dec 13)