nanog mailing list archives

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes


From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 18:46:36 -0400

On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 07:43:36PM +0000, Daniel Corbe wrote:
The main issue with the notion of keeping abuse@ separate from a dedicated
DMCA takedown mailbox is companies like IP Echelon will just blindly E-mail
whatever abuse POC is associated with either the AS record or whichever POCs
are specifically associated with the NET block.

So it becomes kind of difficult to keep them routing to different places.

This is a solvable problem.  If they're sending unsolicited bulk email
(aka "spam"), then they are, by definition, spammers.  Block them and
move on.  If/when they decide to send proper DMCA notices and send them
to the proper address, perhaps you can then allow them to petition for
the privilege of access to your mail system.

---rsk


Current thread: