nanog mailing list archives
Re: Remote power cycle recommendations
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 13:05:16 -0400
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
In particular, if at all possible, do not use the AP9606 era cards with the APCs. They are 10BaseT and take fragile to a whole new level. I usually have to manually force the port to 10 on the switch or put it on a cheap dumb older switch.
They're fragile but they're not _that_ fragile. A switch that can't figure out 10 mbps half duplex... now that's fragile. -Bill -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations, (continued)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Keefe John (Apr 27)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations William Herrin (Apr 27)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Brielle Bruns (Apr 27)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Alan Buxey (Apr 28)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Alain Hebert (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Ben Cannon (Apr 28)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Brielle Bruns (Apr 27)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Roy (Apr 27)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Jeroen Wunnink (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Stephen Satchell (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Brielle Bruns (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations William Herrin (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Stephen Satchell (Apr 30)
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Stephen Satchell (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Remote power cycle recommendations Michel 'ic' Luczak (Apr 30)