nanog mailing list archives
Re: validating reachability via an ISP
From: Don Thomas Jacob <don.thomasjacob () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 12:58:45 +0530
Hi, If you are fine with a commercial tool, Packet Design Route Explorer product supports peering analysis: BGP-RIB-Visualization-1.png <https://www.packetdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/BGP-RIB-Visualization-1.png> is one among its features. https://www.packetdesign.com/solutions/peering-analysis/ Disclaimer: I work for Packet Design Thanks, Don - Don Thomas Jacob LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/donthomasjacob/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/DonThomasJacob> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Alexander Azimov <aa () qrator net> wrote:
Hi Andy, You can use Qrator.Radar API: https://api.radar.qrator.net/. The get-all-paths method will return the set of active paths for selected prefix. 2018-03-29 2:22 GMT+03:00 Andy Litzinger <andy.litzinger.lists () gmail com>:Hi all, I have an enterprise network and do not provide transit. In one of our datacenters we have our own prefixes and rely on two ISPs as BGPneighborsto provide global reachability for our prefixes. One is a large regional provider and the other is a large global provider. Recently we took our link to the global provider offline to perform maintenance on our router. Nearly immediately we were hit with alertsthatour prefix was unreachable and BGPMon alerted that nearly 80 AS's notedourroute had been withdrawn. We were not unreachable from every AS, but we certainly were from some of the largest. The root cause is that the our prefix is not being adequately re-distributed globally by the regional ISP. This is unexpected and weareworking through this with them now. My question is, how can I monitor global reachability for a prefix viathisor any specific provider I use over time? Are there variousroute-serversI can programmatically query for my prefix and get results that includeASpaths? Then I could verify that an "acceptable" number of paths existthatinclude the AS of the all the ISPs I rely upon. And what would an "acceptable" number of alternate paths be? thanks in advance, -andy-- | Alexander Azimov | HLL l QRATOR | tel.: +7 499 241 81 92 | mob.: +7 915 360 08 86 | skype: mitradir | mailto: aa () qrator net | visit: www.qrator.net
Current thread:
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Don Thomas Jacob (Apr 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Andy Litzinger (Apr 04)
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Andy Litzinger (Apr 04)
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Andy Davidson (Apr 05)
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Ben Bartsch (Apr 05)
- Re: validating reachability via an ISP Andy Litzinger (Apr 05)