nanog mailing list archives
Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 07:05:41 +0000
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 at 05:41, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
i have 142 largish bgp customers, a large enough number that the number of prefixes i receive from them varies annoyingly. how do i reasonably automate setting of my outbound prefix limit?First, it seems you know the inbound so automating the outbound issimplearithmetic.I would have said the same... i ought to know high-water marks for your inbound peer count(s), and can work out a +20% outbound...you just assumed that the transitive closure of everybody's cones implement and propagate count. ain't gonna happen.
I am not sure what the issue here is. If I can tell my peering partner a recommended maximum prefix value for them to set on their side, surely I can configure that same value on my side as the upper outbound limit. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Sep 01)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 01)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Christopher Morrow (Sep 01)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Sep 01)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Job Snijders (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Job Snijders (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Christopher Morrow (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Job Snijders (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Theodore Baschak (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Christopher Morrow (Sep 01)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 01)