nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918 network range choices
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 08:30:31 -0400
Well, Some HP unixes, and documentation, still uses 192.1.1.x. Hey free publicity for BBN.I have a client still using 192.1.10/24 just because of it. Been 4 years and they still won't change it :(
----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 10/05/17 20:14, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On Oct 5, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Steve Feldman <feldman () twincreeks net> wrote: I have a vague recollection of parts of 192.168.0.0/16 being used as default addresses on early Sun systems. If that's actually true, it might explain that choice.192.9.200.X rings a bell; but those might have been the example addresses they used in the SunOS 3.X documentation.
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices, (continued)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 06)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jerry Cloe (Oct 05)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jay Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices valdis . kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Brian Kantor (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Joe Provo (Oct 05)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jay Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices William Herrin (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Steve Feldman (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Alain Hebert (Oct 06)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Owen DeLong (Oct 06)