nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 21:29:26 +0200
On Fri, May 5, 2017, at 18:55, LF OD wrote:
of our existing ASNs and peerings. As it turns out, there are many routers that can do VRFs but you cannot put a unique ASN on each VRF so replicating the old environment isn't quite that straightforward. The BGP remote-as looks to be a possible alternative solution, but we've never
You mean *local-as*, right ? Otherwise, there was a vendor that allowed different ASN per VRF but only with non-MPLS vrfs, and that product line is both end-of-sale and major overkill for your set-up.
Current thread:
- Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS LF OD (May 05)
- Re: Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS Tyler Conrad (May 05)
- Re: Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 05)
- RE: Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS Tony Wicks (May 05)