nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier classification
From: Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 11:55:14 -0400
So there are now Carrier Class carriers and Food Grade Carriers? Who in the greater community defines terms like this?
On May 13, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 8:45 AM Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> wrote: Are the terms tier-1,2,3 dead terms or still valid ways to define carriers?Yes, pretty much dead. There are networks that meet your price / performance, and those that don't.
Current thread:
- Carrier classification Matt Hoppes (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Ca By (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Matt Hoppes (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Mark Tinka (May 14)
- Re: Carrier classification Matt Hoppes (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Mike Hammett (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Ca By (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Mark Tinka (May 14)
- Re: Carrier classification Bradley Huffaker (May 15)
- Re: Carrier classification Ca By (May 15)
- Re: Carrier classification Large Hadron Collider (May 15)
- Re: Carrier classification Ken Chase (May 15)
- Re: Carrier classification joel jaeggli (May 15)
- Re: Carrier classification Ca By (May 13)
- Re: Carrier classification Randy Bush (May 15)