nanog mailing list archives
RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:52:11 -0600
Yes, thanks, I am going to do that. But, is there a middle ground between being default only and full routes ? Like is it advantageous for me to ask for partial routes (like their routes and direct peers and default route) ? This way I don't have millions of routes but I guess only a few hundred thousand or less? Let me know please. -Aaron
Current thread:
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent, (continued)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Marty Strong via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Alarig Le Lay (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Howard Leadmon (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Job Snijders (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeremy Austin (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 04)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jared Mauch (Mar 02)