nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cellular enabled console server
From: Jensen Tyler <JTyler () fiberutilities com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:13:36 +0000
+1 for opengear as well. We have over 100 deployed and have been a solid product as well as a good company to work with. We also setup a private network with Verizon so that our console servers would not be on the Internet. Jensen Tyler Sr Engineering Manager Fiberutilities Group, LLC -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Leo Bicknell Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 10:26 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cellular enabled console server In a message written on Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:08:52AM -0600, Ben Bartsch wrote:
NANOG - Are any of you running a console server to access your network equipment via a serial connection at a remote site? If so, what are you using and how much do you like it? I have a project where I need to stand up over 100 remote sites and would like a backdoor to the console just to be able to see what's going on with the equipment to hopefully avoid a truck roll for something simple like a hung device. I need 4 console ports and 1 RJ45 ethernet jack. My quick Google search landed me at BlackBox LES1204A-3G-R2, but I've never actually used such a device. This would be for use in the USA.
OpenGear all the way. Models for every need. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Current thread:
- Re: Cellular enabled console server Simon Woodhead (Mar 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cellular enabled console server Jensen Tyler (Mar 02)