nanog mailing list archives
Re: Conference Videos
From: Steve Feldman <feldman () twincreeks net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:06:28 -0700
On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote: Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a catastrophic effect on conference attendance. NANOG doesn't seem to have that issue. Any background on the process to get there? Any regrets?
Many attendees also find value in the parts of the conference that aren't recorded, like hallway conversations, informal meetings, and even social events. Keeping and maintaining the archive of slides and video recordings is an essential part of NANOG's educational mission, which was key to obtaining and maintaining the IRS 401(c)(3) nonprofit status. So at least for the time I was on the Board, not only were there no regrets, but we worked hard to maintain and enhance the video experience. Steve
Current thread:
- Conference Videos Mike Hammett (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Steve Feldman (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Chris Russell (Mar 14)
- Re: Conference Videos Christian de Larrinaga (Mar 14)
- Re: Conference Videos Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Bob Evans (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Steve Feldman (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos James Downs (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Brandon Butterworth (Mar 13)
- Re: Conference Videos Chris Russell (Mar 14)