nanog mailing list archives

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes


From: Pete Baldwin <pete () tccmail ca>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:08:01 -0500

Looks like it was taken off the list in Sept 2016. I suppose this could be the reason why our block is still listed in various networks, even though it's not on a known 'official' list.


Thanks for the tip Mike.



-----

Pete Baldwin
Tuckersmith Communications
(P) 519-565-2400
(C) 519-441-7383

On 03/11/2017 01:53 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
It looks like Spamhaus has your entire /16.

https://stat.ripe.net/163.182.192.0%2F18#tabId=anti-abuse



On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Laurent Dumont
<admin () coldnorthadmin com> wrote:
Out of curiosity, who were the previous owner(s), it seems that ARIN only
shows the current owner with any history? If it was a Chinese/Russian block,
you might be out of luck.



On 03/10/2017 12:00 PM, Pete Baldwin wrote:
Hi All,

     Hopefully this is not taken in bad taste.   Our organization purchased
some IP space last year (163.182.192.0/18 to be specific), and it appears
that this block must have been used for less-than-admirable purposes in the
past.

We have been trying to clean up the reputation where possible, and we do
not appear to be on any blacklists, but we do appear to be blocked from a
lot of networks across the US/Canada.    I am noticing a lot of name servers
blocking our requests, many web servers, gaming servers, mail etc.

This is a transition block for us to move towards v6 everywhere, but we
have many systems that will need to rely on this block of space for some
time to come.

We are a small rural co-op ISP in Ontario, and I am just writing this
email as an extra plea so that if you happen to run a network that has this
entire range on your naughty list, we would appreciate you giving it another
chance.  I can be contacted on or off list, thanks.






Current thread: