nanog mailing list archives
Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:22:27 -0500
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:28:23 -0600, "james.d--- via NANOG" said:
Those statistics are nowhere near real world for ROI. You'd have to invest at least 7 figures (USD) in resources. So the return must be millions of dollars before anyone can detect the attack. Except, it's already detectable.
*Somebody* has to invest 7 figures in resources. Doesn't have to be you. Remember that if you have access to a 1M node botnet, you could have 56,940,000 hours of CPU time racked racked up in... under 60 hours.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble James DeVincentis via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Mar 01)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble james.d--- via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble James DeVincentis via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Nick Hilliard (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble James DeVincentis via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Royce Williams (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jimmy Hess (Mar 02)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Mar 02)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble james.d--- via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble James DeVincentis via NANOG (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Peter Kristolaitis (Mar 01)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Mar 01)