Re: Google Cloud and IX - Traffic behavior

[Gordon Cook <cook () cookreport com>]

Hi Alain and all the rest
  I het it now 

no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i will continue observing as i have since 1995

thank you allagin
PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD

:-)
thanks once more




> On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> wrote:
>
>    Hi,
>
>    Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT...
>
>    And no latency wise they're about the same.  In the 35ms range.
>
>    But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency alone cannot be the factor.
>
>    ( And Gordy...  what?!? )
>
> -----
> Alain Hebert                                ahebert () pubnix net
> PubNIX Inc.
> 50 boul. St-Charles
> P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
> Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
>
> On 06/16/17 19:42, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> > Alain,
> >
> > When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are these PNI's with Google?  Do the GCLD 
> > instance you reach through "normal peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
> >
> > -- Stephen
> >
> > On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
> > >     Hi,
> > >
> > >     Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the target goes through normal peering than through an 
> > > exchanges google exists in?
> > >
> > >     We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can upload up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path 
> > > goes through, lets say TorIX, but cannot get more than 20Mbps on similar hosts (8 of them) sittings on our peering 
> > > links.
> > >
> > >     PS; Those sames hosts get up to their link limit ( 1Gbps ) between each others and others test points we have;
> > >
> > >     PS: Wireshark capture show nothing abnormal;
> > >
> > >     PS: Links aren't congested, and so on...
> > >
> > > Ref 1 - 200Mbps is on a link rate-limited to 300Mbps.  Its my only test point with a TorIX access