nanog mailing list archives
Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
From: "tim () pelican org" <tim () pelican org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0100 (BST)
On Tuesday, 20 June, 2017 14:41, "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> said:
I'm still not sure people understand the situation. There's an attendee list, but that list doesn't have e-mail addresses. It didn't come from the mailing list. The person looked up who went to the conference and then found their e-mail address elsewhere. I also don't think the above is wrong in any way and people should just get on with their lives.
Fair point, that's a lot harder to tie back to NANOG (although, of course, if you follow the scheme religiously, you *can* find out where they looked you up :) ) Regards, Tim.
Current thread:
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees, (continued)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Josh Luthman (Jun 21)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Ge Dupin (Jun 21)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Tom Beecher (Jun 21)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Dave Temkin (Jun 14)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Jon Lewis (Jun 14)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Dave Temkin (Jun 14)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Rod Beck (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees tim () pelican org (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Mike Hammett (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees tim () pelican org (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Rod Beck (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees Ge Dupin (Jun 19)