Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees

[i mawsog via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Agree, this thread has generated more "spam" or noise for all of us collectively. 
Some amount of relevant "spam"  has to be tolerated for vendor to continue supporting NANOG. Also relevant "spam" or 
sales call is a good way to find out about new technologies , that one may not have heard about otherwise.  
Another tip, just ignore,  the "spammer" will go away eventually.  


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Rodney Joffe<rjoffe () centergate com> wrote:   I guess that explains why so many 
newcomers are confused about what spam is. 

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 5:33 AM, Ge Dupin <gdupin () taho fr> wrote:
>
> It looks like there are more spams coming from these discussions than from the original Scams/Spams..
> Ge
>
> > > Le 14 juin 2017 à 14:26, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe () centergate com> a écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
> > >
> > > But as I said, harvesting emails is not illegal under can spam. And the requirement to not send you UCE to 
> > > harvested emails is pointless, because how do you prove that someone did that?
> > Because he said so?
> >
> > > > > > The spammer had the balls to say, in his email:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > We do not know each other. I'm leveraging the attendee list for NANOG to reach out and raise awareness of the 
> > > > > > > value of OCS (Optical Circuit Switching) in the data center and in particular, the Carrier Neutral Hotel where 
> > > > > > > we've been active with next generation MeetMeRoom discussions.
>