nanog mailing list archives

Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:10:37 +1000


In message <38E506A8-247A-478F-9C4D-21602BEE6028 () beckman org>, Mel Beckman writes:
That still leaves the question: how to you invoke this financial
punishment? Prohibit NANOG members from buying their products?

Everyone that has received the email bring a action under the
CAN-SPAM act.  Really if you don't want the list to be harvested,
which is illegal under the act, bring the action.  Opt out doesn't
save the sender if they have already committed a illegal act.

Mark

-mel via cell

On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:31:46PM +0000, Mel Beckman wrote:
Sometimes they're ignorant and don't realize they're spamming.

That excuse stopped being viable sometime in the last century.  They
know
exactly what they're doing, they're just counting on the prospective
gains to outweigh the prospective losses.  If they're right, then the
spamming will not only continue, it will increase.  (As we've seen:
over and over and over again.)  That's because they don't care about
being professional or responsible or ethical: they only care about
profits.

So the choice is clear: either make it plain to such "people" (if I
may dignify sociopathic filth with that term) that this is absolutely
unacceptable and that it will have serious, immediate, ongoing negative
financial consequences, or do nothing while the problem escalates
indefinitely.

   If you give people the means to hurt you, and they do it, and
   you take no action except to continue giving them the means to
   hurt you, and they take no action except to keep hurting you,
   then one of the ways you can describe the situation is "it isn't
   scaling well".
       --- Paul Vixie, on NANOG

---rsk

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: