nanog mailing list archives

RE: DWDM Optics cheaper than CWDM Optics?


From: Luke Guillory <lguillory () reservetele com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:37:00 +0000

Karl,

I've bought at least 20k in optics from them in the last 2 years, from QSFP DAC, QSFP to 10g breakouts and everything 
in between and the only thing to fail was 1 QSFP breakout cable.  A partner of ours uses their DWDM optics and passive 
MUXs while I've used their CWDM with no issues.






Luke Guillory
Network Operations Manager

Tel:    985.536.1212
Fax:    985.536.0300
Email:  lguillory () reservetele com

Reserve Telecommunications
100 RTC Dr
Reserve, LA 70084

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer:
The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be 
copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this 
e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be 
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does 
not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
transmission. .

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Karl Gerhard
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:17 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: DWDM Optics cheaper than CWDM Optics?

Hello,

fs.com offers DWDM optics that are cheaper than CWDM optics:
CWDM 80km 10G for 600$ http://www.fs.com/c/cisco-cwdm-sfp-plus-2425?70-80km
DWDM 80km 10G for 420$ http://www.fs.com/c/cisco-dwdm-sfp-plus-2485?70-80km

This is significant.
Is this for real? Has anybody bought their DWDM optics?

Going with DWDM and passive Mux/Demux seems to be cheaper nowadays than going with CWDM.

Regards
Karl

Current thread: