nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:55:01 -0500
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:58:46AM -0500, Ray Soucy wrote:
Ideally a cloud-managed device so that the config wouldn't need to be rebuilt in the event of a hardware swap.
That opens them to a class breach: instead of one getting compromised they *all* get compromised. Better to save the configuration to cheap local media like a USB stick. Yes, it could get lost, but that doesn't break or compromise the device, and it only affects one device. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security bzs (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Michael Thomas (Feb 07)
- RE: IoT security Keith Medcalf (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 10)