nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:00:02 -0500
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:04:07 -0800, clinton mielke said:
As an ISP, scan your customers netrange, and notify customers with known vulnerable devices. With regards to the current Mirai threat, theres only a handful of devices that are the most critical importance. IE, biggest fraction of the infected host pie.
Do enough of these poorly designed devices punch themselves a UPNP hole in the CPE firewall and make themselves detectable, to make this a viable approach?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Randy Bush (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Richard (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Ed Lopez (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Damian Menscher (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Carl Byington (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Marco Slater (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security bzs (Feb 09)