nanog mailing list archives
Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP
From: Brock Tice <brock () bmwl co>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 04:19:33 -0700
On 2017-12-28 04:11, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Thanks for sharing. It's interesting to see enterprise customers adopting OpenWRT/LEDE despite no official support from CPE vendors for 3rd party firmware on their products.
One reason we are using Linksys so far is their nominal support for "open source" on their routers. I started testing with the WRT 1900ACS, which is a bit expensive for us to be handing out to everyone. We will be using those for customers on higher-speed plans. Honestly, given the number of bugs we've dealt with from our other vendors, and the lack of ability to fix (or even find) them ourselves, I'm at least as comfortable with OpenWRT/LEDE as I am with, say AirOS or RouterOS deployed in our network.
Current thread:
- Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)
- Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Implementing 464XLAT at a small WISP JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Dec 28)