nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS PATH limits
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:50:36 -0500
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
William Herrin wrote:The AS path lengths we're talking about are unreasonable."unreasonable" is a peculiar word to use here :-) It's the internet and you can't expect other people not to do silly things from time to time. This is a known problem and it isn't even the first time it's been discussed on nanog-l. If you've been hit with a known service-affecting problem that can easily recur without warning and which will be service affecting if it hits again, common sense suggests that it would be a good idea to upgrade to a version of code which isn't affected.
Well, that's a brilliant platitude, but what do you do when it breaks over and over until the other guy upgrades? -Bill -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Mike Tancsa (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Baldur Norddahl (Dec 23)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AS PATH limits Scott Weeks (Dec 22)
- Re: AS PATH limits William Herrin (Dec 22)