nanog mailing list archives
Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:23:56 -0800
--- owen () delong com wrote: From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
But I'd argue that if I have personal nanotech, I *really* want to use ULA addresses. They're *my* nanotech. :)
Feel free. Personally, I still see ULA as an absurdity. ------------------------------------------------------------ Why? More tools to solve more problems. scott
Current thread:
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing, (continued)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Tyler Conrad (Dec 17)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Ca By (Dec 17)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Richard Porter (Dec 17)
- RE: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Robert Webb (Dec 17)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Mark Andrews (Dec 17)
- RE: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Robert Webb (Dec 17)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Scott Morizot (Dec 18)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Robert Webb (Dec 18)
- Re: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 19)
- RE: Companies using public IP space owned by others for internal routing Robert Webb (Dec 17)