nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arista Layer3
From: Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:09:06 +0000
Their L3 stuff is as stable as their L2 stuff, in general. MP-BGP and VRFs are a tiny bit bleeding edge/lacking features, however for plain OSPF/BGP, they're great. /Ruairi On 30 November 2017 at 18:36, Romeo Czumbil <Romeo.Czumbil () tierpoint com> wrote:
So I've been using Arista as layer2 for quite some time, and I'm pretty happy with them. Kicking the idea around to turn on some Layer3 features but I've been hearing some negative feedback. The people that I did hear negative feedback don't use Arista themselves. (they just heard....) So do we have any Arista L3 people out here that can share some negatives or positives? Use case: Just some MPLS IPv4/IPv6 routing, l2vpn OSPF/BGP Maybe 20k routes (no full internet routes) 7050 Series 7280 Series -Romeo
Current thread:
- Arista Layer3 Romeo Czumbil (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Frederik Kriewitz (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Nicholas Buraglio (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Ruairi Carroll (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Tyler Conrad (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Ken Chase (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Jared Mauch (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Colton Conor (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Jared Mauch (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Ken Chase (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Nick Hilliard (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Job Snijders (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Ken Chase (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Frederik Kriewitz (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 joel jaeggli (Dec 01)
- Re: Arista Layer3 Ken Chase (Dec 01)