nanog mailing list archives

Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:28:29 -0500

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Ryan Hamel <Ryan.Hamel () quadranet com>
wrote:

A colleague of mine has static routed 172.16.0.0/32 to a usable IP
address, to have a single known IP address be static routed to a regions
closest server. While I understand the IP address does work (pings and what
not), I don't feel this should be the proper IP address used, but something
more feasible like a usable IP in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for
example).


Hi Ryan,

Some clarifications:

1. You say, "static routed to a regions closest server." What do you mean
by that? A static-routed anycast address?

2. In what reachability context? Is this a private network? An ISP network
where the reachability should be the ISP and its customers?

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>


Current thread: