nanog mailing list archives
Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings
From: Alexander Azimov <aa () qrator net>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:54:49 +0300
Job, thank you for the intro. :) Dear Mike, the radar project is operating its own BGP collector system which improves when we have more sessions and loses data, when BGP sessions are going down. While it's overall amount is constantly growing (it reached 400 a month ago), there are sessions that disconnect from our RR. Visibility of peering relations is most vulnerable in this case because they are not globally visible. So, when one ISP shutdowns session there may be a decrease in numbers of peers for this ISP and its providers. At the moment we are not contacting users when BGP session goes down, maybe we should reconsider these politics. 6 дек. 2017 г. 5:47 PM пользователь "Job Snijders" <job () instituut net> написал: On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 at 15:42, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
I haven't brought it up with them, no. I didn't think it was a mass issue until last night. I wanted to check with other users before I went to them. Maybe I should have done the opposite.
Yes, you should’ve. The Qrator folks are good people. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Yang Yu (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Job Snijders (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Alexander Azimov (Dec 08)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Yang Yu (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Alexander Lyamin (Dec 06)