nanog mailing list archives
RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider
From: Edwin Pers <EPers () ansencorp com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:58:07 +0000
On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:26:00 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:
Better yet, why not study the large-scale patterns over time and proactively address it?
If only there was some sort of distributed analytics/search/etc platform they could use to do that.... https://www.elastic.co/ https://aws.amazon.com/elasticsearch-service/ It's not hard. Only took me by myself a few days of farting around to learn it and start getting good hard information out of a single local ES instance that was being fed nothing but firewall logs. I'm sure they would have no trouble with it On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:40:00 -0500, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu said: Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:40 PM
Is anybody selling monitoring gear that can do deep packet inspection at line rate on a 100G pipe?
Found this within a few minutes of looking: https://accoladetechnology.com/portfolio-item/anic-200Ku/ Not sure if it would meet the needs but I'm sure that there's something out there that can do it. The actual inspection of captured packets doesn't have to be line rate (unless you want to ban people on the fly). Either way, with their resources, anything is possible. I'm sure Cisco would sell you a complete "solution" as well, along with the hefty service contract that comes with buying into Big Green On Wed, 06 Dec 2017 16:43:00 -0500, Brian Kantor said:
For the largest players, I can see no economic advantage in being a good network neighbor, and plenty of cost (salaries, equipment) to do so.
Exactly. But at the same time we don't see this with google, digital ocean, etc other big players in the market. I don't see any feasible way to get them to change their behavior either. For all we know they're already doing this. But if they are they aren't doing much with the data they get out of it -ed
Current thread:
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider, (continued)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Stephen Satchell (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider amuse (Dec 04)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Edwin Pers (Dec 05)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Stephen Satchell (Dec 05)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Gordon Ewasiuk via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Stephen Satchell (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Gordon Ewasiuk via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Rich Kulawiec (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider valdis . kletnieks (Dec 06)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Edwin Pers (Dec 06)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Edwin Pers (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Filip Hruska (Dec 06)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Edwin Pers (Dec 06)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Michael S. Singh (Dec 04)
- RE: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider timrutherford (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider John Levine (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider valdis . kletnieks (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider Brad Knowles (Dec 04)
- Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider valdis . kletnieks (Dec 04)