![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnet gr>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:20:41 +0300
I guess you're looking into something similar to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keyur-idr-bgp-prefix-limit-orf. -- Tassos Jörg Kost wrote on 31/8/17 13:50:
What about adding an option to the BGP session that A & B do agree on a fixed number of prefixes in both directions, so Bs prefix-in could be As prefix-out automatically? Jörg
Current thread:
- Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Michael Still (Aug 29)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Alejandro Acosta (Aug 30)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Jörg Kost (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Job Snijders (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Jörg Kost (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Michael Still (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Jörg Kost (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Leo Bicknell (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Christopher Morrow (Aug 31)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Alejandro Acosta (Aug 30)
- Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Aug 31)