nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?
From: "Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 03:14:11 +0000
Good use-case for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out and snapshot auditing before and after changes. Leak didn't last long but it could have been caught within milliseconds verses minutes via oh sh** alarms. --Tim On 8/29/17, 6:46 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Randy Bush" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of randy () psg com> wrote: >> Damn you Google.. yup. Thanks for links. > A public post-mortem would be highly appreciated (from all parties). there has been more press hysteria on this than actual packet droppage. goog fat fingered or otherwise misannounced a numer of large consumer isp's prefixes. the leak was for aybe 20 minutes. almost no one over here noticed. but the press, isoc, ... said "japan knocked off the internet." take that as a calibration of the press, isoc, ... randy
Current thread:
- Verizon 701 Route leak? Marcus Josephson (Aug 28)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Aug 28)
- RE: Verizon 701 Route leak? Marcus Josephson (Aug 28)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Job Snijders (Aug 28)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Julien Goodwin (Aug 28)
- RE: Verizon 701 Route leak? Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Tim Evens (tievens) (Aug 30)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- RE: Verizon 701 Route leak? Marcus Josephson (Aug 28)
- Re: Verizon 701 Route leak? Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Aug 28)