nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100G - Whitebox
From: Raymond Burkholder <ray () oneunified net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 13:38:25 -0300
On 08/20/17 13:30, Mike Hammett wrote:
DNX/Jericho would have sufficient buffers to handle the rate conversions?
You could try Mellanox. Some of the promotional stuff I've seen/heard indicates their focus on appropriate sized buffers & low packet loss on rate conversion.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
-- Raymond Burkholder https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Current thread:
- 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Joel Jaeggli (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Raymond Burkholder (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Bill Woodcock (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Fredrik Korsbäck (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Nick Hilliard (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Coyo Stormcaller (Aug 21)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Fredrik Korsbäck (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Joel Jaeggli (Aug 20)