nanog mailing list archives

Re: CGNAT


From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnet gr>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:20:35 +0300

With a ~59% dual-stack percentage and a 8% ds-lite percentage (aka 67%
of our subscriber base has IPv6), we get around 40% of IPv6 traffic.

--
Tassos

Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote on 10/4/2017 1:11 μμ:
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 20:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:

BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
load of CGNAT?
Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual 
stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.
My data on customers supposed to be 100% dual-stack (unless they
explicitely disable IPv6 on their side, which some of them do) says 25%
on best days. It used to be up to 35% in late 2015.
For reason unknown, it was going slightly down during 2016, with a
sudden extra decrease in january this year.



Current thread: