nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 21:33:55 +0000
Hi all, Perhaps another explanation is that these are router2router linknets between the involved parties, and all we are seeing is the effect of "redistribute connected". If this is the case, the word "hijack" might be somewhat strong worded. Kind regards, Job On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 23:25, Tyler Conrad <tyler () tgconrad com> wrote: So not only are they hijacking prefixes, they're leaking the /30s to their peers. Failure through and through. On Saturday, April 1, 2017, George William Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com
wrote:
Hey, Bharti, knock that off. http://bgpstream.com/event/78126 http://bgpstream.com/event/78125 http://bgpstream.com/event/78124 http://bgpstream.com/event/78123 http://bgpstream.com/event/78122 Sent from my iPhone
Current thread:
- AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks George William Herbert (Apr 01)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks Tyler Conrad (Apr 01)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks Job Snijders (Apr 01)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Apr 01)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks netravnen+nanog (Apr 02)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks Job Snijders (Apr 01)
- Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks Tyler Conrad (Apr 01)