nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast and msoft ports
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Randy Bush wrote:
sigh. well that was some fun hours debugging; not.
135/137/139/445 has seen widespread filtering since... errr.. 2000? I know it was widely done back in those days when people were connecting their computers directly to the bridged modem/ETTH jack and things ended up in the newspapers that peoples files were available on the Internet because they didn't set a password on their windows share.... or when versions of Windows were pwned during installation of Windows because... Windows.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- RE: comcast and msoft ports Ryan, Spencer (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Filip Hruska (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Jared Mauch (Sep 12)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Jared Mauch (Sep 12)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Gregg Heimer (Sep 12)