nanog mailing list archives
Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193
From: Pshem Kowalczyk <pshem.k () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 22:12:30 +0000
Hi, We're looking at rolling out IPv6 to our internal DC infrastructure. Those systems support only our internal network and in the IPv4 world they all live in 'private' space of 10.0.0.0/8. I was wondering if anyone uses the fc00::/7 space for these sort of things or do ppl use a bit of their public IPv6 allocation and manage the security for those ranges? I realise I'd have to use a proxy or NAT66 for the regular outbound connectivity (but we do it already for IPv4 anyway). The truth is that even if we do use something out of our public allocation we're likely to do the same thing (just to be sure that nothing spills out accidentally). So what do you do in this space? kind regards Pshem
Current thread:
- Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Josh Reynolds (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Karl Auer (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Ryan, Spencer (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Ca By (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Yang Yu (Sep 08)