nanog mailing list archives
Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust
From: nanog-isp () mail com
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:25:38 +0200
From: "Owen DeLong"I know, but for the "server guys" turning on IPv6 it's pretty low on priority list.Which is a selfish, arrogant, and extremely short-sighted and unenlightened view of self-interest.
Yes, yes, but is it economically rational? Jared
Current thread:
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust, (continued)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Mark Andrews (Sep 25)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Sep 25)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Mark Andrews (Sep 25)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Sep 26)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Paul Thornton (Sep 25)
- Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Sep 25)