nanog mailing list archives
Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:39:09 -0400
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:31:12PM +0200, Alexander Maassen wrote:
Maybe its time then for a global accepted, unified way to send/report abuse???
There are -- see Valdis's followup. But there's still no viable substitute for a working abuse@ address with clueful eyeballs on the other side of it. Every responsible and professional operation on this planet has that. The really good ones learn from what shows up there and pro-actively deal with abuse issues before anyone else is bothered by them, which not only makes them better netizens but reduces the volume of incoming complaints. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses, (continued)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Brian Rak (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Brian Rak (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Tom Beecher (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Hugo Slabbert (Sep 22)
- Re: PlayStationNetwork blocking of CGNAT public addresses Rich Kulawiec (Sep 23)