nanog mailing list archives
Optical transceiver question
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:23:30 -0500
We recently purchased some generic optics from a reputable reseller that were marketed to reach 60 km. But what we found, based on the spec sheets, is that it could only reach that distance if the optics were transmitting on the high side of the transmit power range. For example, if the TX range was 0 to +5 dBm and minimum RX power was -20 dB, the designed optical budget should be no more than 20 dB (0 - -20). Based on the wavelength the appropriate loss would be 0.4 dB/km and results in only 50 km, not 60 km. To get 60 km it would need 24 dB of link margin, and that would only be attainable if it was transmitting on the high side, at +4 dBm. Is it an industry practice to market distance based on the hot optics, not on the worst case, which is minimum TX power? Frank
Current thread:
- Optical transceiver question Frank Bulk (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Eric Kuhnke (Sep 07)
- RE: Optical transceiver question Robert Jacobs (Sep 07)
- RE: Optical transceiver question Jameson, Daniel (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Nicolas Cortes (Sep 07)
- RE: Optical transceiver question Robert Jacobs (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Jared Mauch (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Olivier Benghozi (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Nick Hilliard (Sep 07)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 08)
- RE: Optical transceiver question frnkblk (Sep 11)
- Re: Optical transceiver question Eric Kuhnke (Sep 07)