nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:59:48 +0200
* Mel Beckman:
If we can't police ourselves, someone we don't like will do it for us.
That hasn't happened with with IP spoofing, has it? As far as I understand it, it is still a major contributing factor in denial-of-service attacks. Self-regulation has been mostly unsuccessful, and yet nothing has happened on the political level.
Current thread:
- "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 11)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? FHR (Sep 11)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Blake Hudson (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ryan, Spencer (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Florian Weimer (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Jared Mauch (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ryan, Spencer (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Paras Jha (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Jean-Francois Mezei (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 12)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Jean-Francois Mezei (Sep 12)