nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 voice outage
From: Marco Teixeira <admin () marcoteixeira com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 20:52:52 +0100
... but back then they didn't have ITIL and the likes (at least not that i knew... but then again, i was just starting with networking back then), where a ChM process must produce risk, impact, etc, reports, and at least one peer review meeting for approval :) = Marco On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:33 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:10:44 +0100, Marco Teixeira said:Had it been an approved chance it would have been rolled back i guess...See the 1990 ATT long-distance collapse for a worked example.
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 voice outage, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Marco Teixeira (Oct 04)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Mel Beckman (Oct 04)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Marco Teixeira (Oct 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Mel Beckman (Oct 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Marco Teixeira (Oct 04)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Mel Beckman (Oct 04)
- RE: Level 3 voice outage Gareth Tupper (Oct 05)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Mel Beckman (Oct 05)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage voytek (Oct 13)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: Level 3 voice outage Marco Teixeira (Oct 04)