nanog mailing list archives
Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:20:20 -0700
On 10/27/2016 01:30 PM, J wrote:
I'm in the camp of not replying to every report.
I was in that camp, too, when I was mail admin for a web host company. I wanted to spend my time fixing the flood, without having to take the time to reply. I figure the best reply is when the spamming stops. I have about 30 mail endpoints of my own that I monitor, so it becomes obvious real quick when someone takes action. :)
Current thread:
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?, (continued)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Christopher Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Jimmy Hess (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Leo Bicknell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? bzs (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)