nanog mailing list archives
Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11
From: Luke Guillory <lguillory () reservetele com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 17:09:21 +0000
VPNs can accomplish this without opening ports directly to devices. Luke Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2016, at 12:06 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com<mailto:deleskie () gmail com>> wrote: It is also likely the desired use case. In my office I like to be able to login when needed when on the road, when the alarm company calls me at 2am for a false alarm so I don't have to get someone else out of bed to have them dispatched to check on the site. -jim On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com<mailto:cboyd () gizmopartners com>> wrote: On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net<mailto:nanog () ics-il net>> wrote: "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific types of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified" Serious question... how? Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet access seems to work for us. We have a lot of cheap IP cameras in our facility and none of them can reach the net. But this is probably a bit beyond the capabilities of the general home user. —Chris Luke Guillory Network Operations Manager [cid:imagee03d14.JPG@65e9954a.43918993] <http://www.rtconline.com> Tel: 985.536.1212 Fax: 985.536.0300 Email: lguillory () reservetele com Web: www.rtconline.com Reserve Telecommunications 100 RTC Dr Reserve, LA 70084 Disclaimer: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
Current thread:
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11, (continued)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Eliot Lear (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ca By (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 John Levine (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Stephen Satchell (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Chris Boyd (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 jim deleskie (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Stephen Satchell (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Luke Guillory (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 jim deleskie (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Luke Guillory (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mel Beckman (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Peter Baldridge (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Ray Van Dolson (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Mike Hammett (Oct 22)
- Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 22)